DEAR DR. NERDLOVE: Sorry in advance for some grammar mistakes, English is not my native language.
The tl;dr version of the letter is basically “How does an aromantic, very sexually confused autistic guy with an avoidant attachment style deal with relationships?” (and by relationship, I mean, friend with benefits with the emphasis on friend)
Now, doing things in order, I’m aromantic, meaning that I never felt any romantic attraction towards anyone. I do feel sexual attraction (more on that later), but I never had romantic crushes (or I can’t make the difference between them and friendship), so I suppose that in the 35 years of my existence if I never had them, I won’t have them for the rest of it. I’m not romance averse, as long as it’s not directed at me. If it is, then it feels icky.
Then, there’s my sexuality. And the shortest word to describe it is chaos (technically it’s abrosexual if you want the label, but it’s a weird one). It’s literally changing all the time. I wouldn’t be able to tell you what I’d find attractive in the next 20 minutes. Trying to make sense of it makes me even more confusing, so it’s easier to go with the flow. But it’s not something that I can do with dealing with people IRL. That mysterious person wouldn’t be able to change their gender to match the chaos inside me (and still, they’d have to deal with the moments I’m not attracted to anyone anyway).
And finally, the attachment style. I’m avoidant, meaning that at first, I will seem to get closer to you, until one point where I’ll keep you at arm length. I can’t really pinpoint the moment where I’ll start do that though and it’s mostly unconscious. On the other hand, I do know that I do that, so I won’t go to the extreme of starting to ghost or block people out of it, but I can be a bit colder, especially, if you’re forcing me to get closer. There’s also the “funny” situation where I get more attracted to people who are unavailable to me.
The self-esteem could also be better. I’m finding myself annoying most of the time. But looking at the data, I can’t confirm it’s how other people see me, since I still have friends who visibly like to hang around with me. So not really sure how, but I’m doing something right there. And I even had some people admitting having a crush on me (somehow???), not that it’s great with my situation.
So how to find someone with that? An easy answer could be some one-night stands, but that isn’t too interesting to me to begin with and then the autism and the social anxiety going with it wouldn’t let me live that down (my brain would scream danger to me for the entire thing). So, a longer thing is necessary to me. That’s why I talked earlier the friend with benefits, with the emphasis on friend.
How can I do that to a person? Basically, it would be asking of them: If you fall in love with me, I won’t be able to return your feelings, I’m not sure when I’d feel attracted to you and if you get too close to me, I will start running away while giving mixed signals. Who the hell would want that over any other decent relationship? I’m to the point where when one of those people who had a crush on me said that they found someone else, I felt relieved. Like “Good, you have found happiness without having to deal with my BS”.
I know I can work on the avoidant attachment style issue (working on it very slowly, because it’s hard), but the rest stays a puzzle to me. How can I work with that, without causing heartbreak for the other person and guilt on my part?
The Most Complicated Guy
DEAR DATE OR DIE: And here I thought I’d seen every permutation of relationship questions out there. Congrats, MCG, this is a new one for me.
OK, so this one’s a mess, in part because I think you’re asking the wrong questions here. Your problem is that part of what you’re asking for at the end – how do you find the perfect relationship but also ensure that you don’t ever cause someone to get their heart broken – is not just impossible, but also seriously putting the cart before the horse.
Hell, I’m not entirely sure there even is a horse at this point. Or a cart. Mostly just an IKEA kit, a bunch of parts, fasteners and an Allen wrench in a pile and instructions that make no sense.
I know I sound like I’m being dismissive, but what you’re asking is kind of like saying “I want to start running, but I’ve got flat feet, shin splints and reduced lung capacity; how can I find a run club where I won’t completely outshine everyone else in the club?” You’re presuming a whole lot of conclusions before you’ve even gotten to the point of knowing what kind of relationship would even work for you and whether people you would connect with are even at risk of falling in love with you in the first place.
I mean, right off the top, you can’t guarantee that you won’t hurt someone or that you could keep them from falling for you. Not if you’re going to have any sort of intimate or emotionally connected relationship. That’s not how people work, and assuming that there’s some way to thread that needle perfectly is naive at best. Admirable, but naive.
Again: that’s not my saying “bold of you to assume that anyone could love you”, that’s my saying “let’s start with focusing on some basics before we worry about your being such a Casanova that you leave a trail of broken hearts and shattered lives behind you.” Because, quite honestly, I think you’re thinking a little too heteronormative in terms of relationships when you’re anything but. A traditional relationship – even the kind of FWB relationship you’re imagining – isn’t going to work for you. Certainly not under the conditions you’ve described.
I talk a lot about finding people who are right for you, and a big part of that requires knowing what, precisely, you want and what kind of relationship you’re actually open to. Then you would want to look towards finding people who are more likely to be receptive to that kind of relationship. ��So let’s roll it from the top, starting with the easiest part: being aromantic. Aromantic people – that is, folks who don’t feel romantic love – can and do have relationships; I know someone who’s aro who is currently juggling about three or four partners, depending on the day. They genuinely care for their partners, but don’t necessarily feel what most of us would call romantic love for them. Which is fine, honestly; there’re many different kinds of love, and romantic love – agape – isn’t the always the most important part of a relationship.
It is entirely possible, for example, to have a relationship that’s founded on fondness, affection, respect and sexual connection, but not romantic love. Romantic love isn’t the glue that holds a relationship together; it can be the motivator, it can be the intensifier or the reason why the relationship started, but God knows I’ve fielded plenty of questions from people who were wildly in love with their partners… but who couldn’t be in a relationship with them.
To the extent this is going to be relevant to your situation, it means that you’re going to want to prioritize things like mutual compatibility – especially in areas like lifestyle and sexuality – over a romantic connection. It may mean having that you’ll be a little more analytical in who you date or decide to start a relationship with than the average bear, but that’s fine. Data and Spock both had friends and companions throughout their lives. Hell, Spock was basically the third leg of a poly triad of platonic hetero life-mates.
The tricker aspect is your sexuality and your attachment style. I think it would be healthier �– or at least easier for others to grasp – if we referred to your attachment style as “feral cat” or “outdoor cat”. You’ll get close to others, but on your own terms and in your own time and only so close. You vanish for a while, but come back eventually like nothing’d happened. This can be a little frustrating for folks who are expecting a more traditional or conventional connection… but there’re also people who prefer this. There are a lot of folks who are more on the introverted side of the spectrum who could well appreciate a relationship with someone who doesn’t expect a lot of togetherness and who finds time apart as important as time together.
That being said, I wonder how much of this is a matter of a malignant sort of self-protection. You mention that you tend to fall for people who aren’t interested in you, but get cold towards people who try to push for more intimacy. That, to me, sounds like you may be subconsciously saying “I don’t deserve to have a loving relationship”, pushing people away who might actually return your feelings as you direct your attention towards folks who are “safe”. That is – folks who aren’t interested and thus won’t force you to deal with the idea that maybe you are deserving of love and affection.
Considering what you’ve said about your self-esteem, I wouldn’t be surprised if this were the case. A lot of folks on the autism spectrum tend to internalize messages about how they’re “annoying” or “hard to deal with” and take it as a sign that there’s something wrong with them, rather than a matter of society not understanding or being entirely accepting of autistic people. If you’re seeing your autism as being an inherent negative, instead of just being a part of who you are, I could easily see how that could lead to the sort of “go away a little closer” behavior you mention.
And then there’s the abrosexuality. I’ll be honest: this is the first time I’ve heard of it, and I wonder how much of it is truly a matter of “constantly changing” and more that it’s pansexuality with sprinkles. Human sexuality is often a moving target, less of a sliding scale and more of a multi-axis graph that can fluctuate over time. Someone who’s bi or pan, for example, isn’t necessarily equally attracted to two or more genders, nor do they necessarily feel both romantic and sexual attraction in equal measure for the people they’re attracted to. There’re plenty of bi and pan folks who may be sexually attracted to multiple genders, but tend to be romantically attracted to (or more likely to form relationships with) people of one gender or another.
Hell, some folks have a sort of single-target sexuality, where exactly one person of a particular gender hits just right, but they aren’t into other people of that gender.
At the same time however, even people who have more fixed sexualities don’t necessarily find the same people attractive to the same degree at all times. Folks who have a “type” – redheads, dump-truck butts, skinny goth disaster bisexuals, whatever – frequently find themselves into people who aren’t their usual “type”, and may find their types change over time. Likewise, people who need a lot of sexual novelty can find that their desire for a person drops dramatically over time, simply because the newness has worn off.
So I wonder if your abrosexuality is akin to that, but on a more chaotic speed and schedule.
But you’re the expert in your sexuality, not me, so take my thoughts with all appropriate salt and skepticism. Especially since functionally it would all lead to the same place: a traditional committed relationship, even a more conventional friends-with-benefits relationship isn’t going to work for you. Not, at least, with the way things seem to be operating right now.
If you want my honest opinion, based on what you’ve described… well, honestly, I think you’re going to have a hard time squaring this particular circle. An ideal setup would be less of a friends-with-benefits relationship but more of a sexually fluid social group who’re open to occasional sexual encounters, but where the relationship isn’t predicated on sex. The problem is that, unless you manage to live long enough that Dr. Mensah is born and Preservation Alliance is becomes a functional community, this is going to be like trying to find an okapi in the wild, without a map or guide – not impossible but exceedingly difficult.
You might �– and I stress might – find something akin to what you would need as a floater between various polycules in the queer community – a sort of neighborhood cat that everyone feeds and occasionally sleeps in people’s garages or on their patios, but doesn’t really belong to anyone. But again: I think that’s going to be hard to find and a hell of a lot harder to actually pull off successfully.
If you want a practical answer with minimal drama… well, I’d suggest that this is time when developing an established relationship with a few sex-workers would be easiest. This has its own difficulties and complications, for obvious reasons. It would, however, be the simplest in terms of logistics and relationship management. While it wouldn’t be a “relationship” in the most traditional sense, it would allow for the way your sexuality and attachment style work without requiring that you seek out the Goldilocks of relationship-anarchists in Seattle or the Bay Area.
But I think some of this may need to wait until you work on your attachment issues and your self-esteem. I have a sneaking suspicion that self-acceptance and learning to lean into your autism instead of trying to work against it may help considerably. Once you’re not seeing yourself as being a walking, talking annoyance and being deserving of love, I suspect it’ll be a little easier to find relationships that works for you, without all the attendant drama and complications.
Good luck.
Please send your questions to Dr. NerdLove at his website (www.doctornerdlove.com/contact); or to his email, doc@doctornerdlove.com