DEAR DR. FOX: Your post on mRNA vaccines, like Pfizer’s and Moderna’s that saved lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, failed to acknowledge the benefits over the risks. I know you are not against tried-and-true vaccines for people and animals, and while this class of vaccines is new, it holds great promise -- in my opinion as a registered nurse (now retired). -- L.B., Cleveland, Ohio
DEAR L.B.: Vaccinations are of great value in preventing highly communicable diseases such as smallpox, mumps and measles in children, and rabies, distemper and parvovirus in puppies, but the precautionary principle must be applied. In my opinion, companion animals and children alike are being over-vaccinated, and science-based revisions in both sectors must be ongoing.
I wish all health care professionals would spend a little time and read about the adverse reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations. A good place to start is with the study “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults” by Joseph Fraiman et al., published in Vaccine in 2022.
Some additional concerns raised by researchers include the following:
-- The spike protein of the COVID-19 virus, present in widely used vaccines, can cause harm to different people in different ways. The adverse effects of vaccinations for some people, along with long COVID, cannot be denied.
-- The contamination of these genetically engineered mRNA vaccines has been reported. A plethora of DNA fragments is an issue of concern.
-- Persistent post-vaccination symptoms (sometimes classified as “post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome,” or PCVS) resemble those of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Cardiac, vascular and neurological symptoms often emerge shortly after vaccination and persist for months or years, mirroring PASC.
References for all of these issues are provided in my post here: drfoxonehealth.com/post/preventing-pandemics-like-covid-19-and-other-animal-to-human-diseases.
These problems aside, there is growing public distrust and administrative chaos in the U.S., along with a growing anti-science sentiment. We are seeing renewed outbreaks of measles, especially in children, which can be fatal or cause permanent neurological damage and other health problems. Such outbreaks could have been prevented if the anti-vaccination movement had not gained traction in recent years -- led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is now in charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This is unforgivable for all involved.
In June, Kennedy fired and replaced all members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The new members announced plans to review the CDC’s child and adolescent immunization schedules, an action that leaders in the American Academy of Pediatrics said is an effort to sow distrust in vaccines.
Health care professionals do not universally agree on the risks and benefits of particular vaccinations in any age group. The World Health Organization advises vaccinations for pregnant women, for the high-risk immunocompromised and for the elderly, but Kennedy has stated that pregnant women and healthy children do not need to be vaccinated. Then again, many schools mandate it.
Florida officials recently announced that the state would phase out all mandates for childhood vaccines. The same day, the Democratic governors of Washington state, Oregon and California announced that they have created an alliance to establish their own vaccine recommendations because they believe the Trump administration’s politicization of the CDC is putting Americans’ health at risk.
It is little wonder that members of the public, parents especially, are confused.
Kennedy should resume funding the World Health Organization, reinstate staff at the CDC and leave the vaccination issue to the experts. He should get on with banning azo dyes in breakfast cereals and establishing nutrition education programs in all schools. All public spaces should receive improved ventilation systems, treating incoming air with sanitizing ultraviolet light.
His agency, along with the EPA and the USDA, needs to better regulate pesticide use and act against the gross overuse of glyphosate. And the U.S. must join other countries to stop the manufacture of plastics and the burning of fossil fuels.
As I emphasize in my book “One Health: Veterinary, Ethical and Environmental Perspectives,” many public health authorities are overly reliant on vaccinations but do not simultaneously promote other factors of disease prevention, such as sanitation, nutrition education, food safety, and water and air quality.
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)