DEAR READERS: Here is a positive update to the issue that the Center for Biological Diversity called "the largest attack on public lands in U.S. history" -- namely, the proposal from some Senate Republicans to sell off nearly 3 million acres of public lands. According to Associated Press reporter Matthew Daly, the proposal has been blocked on a technicality. Its backers vow to keep trying to get it passed.
All concerned about the current administration’s total disregard for environmental and wildlife protection must remain vigilant. Consider supporting nonprofit organizations such as the CBD, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Nature Conservancy, which are closely monitoring legislative proposals and informing sympathetic politicians to take appropriate action.
Meanwhile, concerns are increasing about large-scale logging in boreal forest areas, including in Saskatchewan, Canada. Some sources report that 1 million acres of the Canadian boreal forest are lost each year to logging, with clearcutting being the dominant logging practice.
All of this deforestation and destruction, as we continue to exacerbate climate change and the loss of biodiversity, is truly insane.
JUDGE RULES AGAINST IMPROVING HORSE WELFARE
I was shocked to learn that Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has blocked new regulations put out by the USDA’s Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service to strengthen regulations within the Horse Protection Act. These new regulations would outlaw the painful act of inflicting chemical soring or mechanical injuries on horses’ legs and hooves to force an exaggerated gait in certain breeds. (For details, see the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, volume 263.)
Animal protection organizations have been opposing these practices for decades. Their continuation is an outrageous and flagrant violation of the rights of equines -- totally unacceptable in any civilized society.
DEAR DR. FOX: I just read your column about the creation of "organ donor pigs." I could not agree with you more. Animal exploitation completely disgusts me, no matter if it leads to “advancements” in treating humans. The cost to the animals is far too high. Thank you for telling the truth. -- M.J., Santa Rosa, California
DEAR M.J.: I always appreciate words of support from readers. Some see this issue of creating organ donor pigs as lifesaving -- and even justified, since so many people eat pigs anyway. But I see it as ethically questionable. It underscores the degree to which humans have evolved into an exploitative global infestation, causing more harm than good.
If we had not so polluted our air, food and water, and if we had considered the quality of life of our fellow creatures, public health would not be so severely compromised today as to justify the need to create organ donor pigs.
PETS GAIN FAMILY MEMBER STATUS IN NYC
A Brooklyn judge has ruled that pet dogs should be considered family members rather than property, allowing a lawsuit to proceed for emotional damages after a pet’s death. The ruling could encourage more people to seek compensation if their dog is harmed or killed. (Full story: Gothamist.com, June 20)
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)