DEAR READERS: The dismantling of United States scientific research institutions continues. From Nature.com, posted May 8:
Advertisement
“U.S. president Donald Trump’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 calls for unprecedented cuts to scientific agencies and targets work in areas including climate change, clean energy and the social, behavioral and economic sciences. The proposal suggests cutting roughly half the budgets of the U.S. National Science Foundation, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the Environmental Protection Agency, which on Friday (May 2) also announced plans to dismantle its primary research division. NASA would also lose about a quarter of its funding. Ultimately, Congress -- which is controlled by a majority from Trump’s Republican party -- will decide how the federal budget will be spent.”
During his joint address to Congress in March, Trump declared, “Our country will be woke no longer.” Many see this as a declaration of a war against reason, empathy, social justice, environmental concerns and responsibility.
Seventeen states have now filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s attempt to stop the development of wind energy. Trump is pushing for more coal mining, and burning, to run data centers for AI and cryptocurrency, bypassing environmental protection laws and threatening endangered species and critical habitats. We need responsible management of AI, but cryptocurrency is ethically questionable altogether. Its transactions consume megawatts of energy and are environmentally harmful.
"One recent study estimates that a single conventional VISA transaction uses 1.5 watt-hours, and a single bitcoin transaction uses 703,250 watt-hours," writes columnist Bruce Saller, citing data from Statista.com. Concerns are being voiced over conflicts of interest in Trump’s promoting cybercurrency and deregulating its oversight while opening his own World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company, along with American Bitcoin and the $Trump meme coin, during this time of extreme climate change -- references to which he has had deleted from federal documents and websites.
The dissolution of the EPA’s Energy Star efficiency rating system for home appliances is incomprehensible. Some may see this dismantling of government for corporate enrichment as a sign of executive dementia or pandering to vested interests. It is notable that the rich are major contributors to climate change. (See the study "High-income groups disproportionately contribute to climate extremes worldwide" by Sarah Schongart et al., published in Nature Climate Change in May.)
According to another recent study, "52% of people born in 2020 will face unprecedented lifetime exposure to heatwaves" -- even under a conservative projection for how climate change will unfold over the next 75 years. Under a more pessimistic forecast, that figure rises to 92%, compared with just 16% of those born in 1960. The study is among the first to pinpoint the numbers of people who will experience an “unprecedented life” in terms of extreme heat. (See the study "Global emergence of unprecedented lifetime exposure to climate extremes" by Luke Grant et al., published in Nature in May.)
I favor the more pessimistic forecast because climate change will also mean shortages of food and fresh water in many regions, compounded by the precipitous decline of bees and other beneficial insects and wildlife.
DEAR DR. FOX: Thank you for your recent essay on Pope Francis. I found it to be heartening, even though the topic of environmental destruction is so very distressing.
I noticed that in my paper, your column sits on top of an ad for our local Humane Society, which promotes animal adoption. I’ve decided to contact their offices and help pay for their advertising costs when it is paired with your column.
I’ve often felt that I should be more involved with local shelters, but I am the type who would want to bring every abandoned dog home with me, so I have avoided their offices. Maybe helping with their advertising bills is a good way for me to contribute.
Again, thank you for your essays, as they are truly thought- and action-provoking. -- B.V., Mount Vernon, Washington
DEAR B.V.: I appreciate your sensitivity and initiative. We can all do something to help our neighbors, and that includes the domestic and wild animals in our communities. So many are at risk from extreme climatic events. I am putting water out for the wildlife around my property, as Minnesota faces an unprecedented heatwave and drought.
Companion animals are at risk from rising care costs and rental housing restrictions, leading to shelter surrenders or abandonment. Many shelters across the U.S. are full.
A common response is to choose to live in denial because empathy hurts. This is a defense mechanism, but one that is ultimately self-limiting. Doing nothing, thinking others will deal with such issues, can feed guilt in those who feel for others.
Civil society has many challenging tasks in these times: combating racism, housing the homeless, helping immigrants, and protecting the rights and well-being of Indigenous peoples and native species (whose protection the Trump administration, under the Endangered Species Act, is eliminating). But we can all do something within our communities to help, including supporting local animal shelters and wildlife rehabilitation centers. We can also take action on our own properties. For example: My lawn is gone, replaced with a rewilded, pollinator-friendly assortment of indigenous plants!
(Send all mail to animaldocfox@gmail.com or to Dr. Michael Fox in care of Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. The volume of mail received prohibits personal replies, but questions and comments of general interest will be discussed in future columns.
Visit Dr. Fox’s website at DrFoxOneHealth.com.)